The LUCID National Data Stream project aims at studying how Swiss clinical practice
and low-value care has evolved in the last decade. The project is creating a National
Data Stream aggregating relevant data from consenting patients that have been
hospitalized in one of five university hospitals across Switzerland: Zurich, Basel,
Bern, Lausanne and Geneva. This data includes existing hospital data and Patient
Reported Outcomes (PROs), the latter being health-related data provided directly by
patients about how they feel, function, or perceive their health and treatment. The
whole data is harmonized to feed a dedicated medical registry, and then used to
design and analyze precise numerical low-value care (LVC) indicators. This will make
it possible to study quantitatively how frequent different types of LVC are, and the
evolution of clinical practice in Swiss hospitals. By identifying factors leading to the
occurrence of low-value care, the ultimate goal of LUCID is to effectively identify
ways to improve healthcare processes.
The Choosing Wisely Initiative (www.choosingwisely.org), launched in 2012 by the
American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Foundation, contributed significantly to structure
the concept of low-value care and to its visibility. Smarter Medicine, its Swiss counterpart
(www.smartermedicine.ch) launched by the Swiss Society of General Internal
Medicine (SSGIM), produced in 2016 a set of recommendations aiming at reducing
low-value care practices. This initiative is recommended by the OECD. While
reducing LVC is necessary for sustainable healthcare systems, there was until this
project started no monitoring of LVC in Swiss hospitals. The burden and
consequences of LVC, as well as the overall impact of the Choosing Wisely Initiative
in Swiss hospitalized patients, remains largely unknown. An efficient method to
translate value-based initiatives into practice is to promote data-driven benchmarking
to uncover potential hospital variation in the provision of LVC and also to disseminate
quality improvement interventions and report on improvements. So far, in
Switzerland, such quality monitoring and improvement initiatives have been limited by
the lack of a federated database able to detect LVC provision in hospitalized patients.
Further, the treatment success from the point of view of the values, needs and
preferences of patients have hardly been monitored so far in Swiss University
hospitals.
Marie Méan (CHUV), Christian Lovis (UniGE/HUG), Jean-Louis Raisaro (CHUV), Drahomir Aujesky (Inselspital), Stefano Bassetti (USB), Christophe Meier (USZ), Jerome Stirnemann (HUG), Alexander Leichtle (Inselspital), Carole Aubert (Inselspital), Florence Vallelian (USZ), Bram Stieltjes (USB), Oksana Riba Grognuz (EPFL), Florian Rüter (USB), Manuela Eicher (CHUV), Arnaud Chiolero (UniFr), Jérémie Despraz (CHUV)